Skip to content
Sahabat Alam Malaysia
  • Home
  • About
  • Programmes
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Shop
  • BMBM
  • Donate
  • Archive

Malaysia may lose by RM5 billion from trade in the TPPA, besides damage in other areas

  • Publication Date | October 24, 2014
  • Document Type | Letter to the Editor
  • Programmes | Development & Planning
  • Issues | Trade & Investment
  • Tags | ISDS, TPP, Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
PDF
Sahabat Alam Malaysia - Forests and biodiversity

SAM supports the following letter sent by the Consumers’ Association of Penang to the media

The Government should thus exit from the TPPA negotiations

A new paper by a senior economist working in a United Nations agency has shown that Malaysia will not enjoy a net gain in terms of its trade balance as a result of joining the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA).  Instead, Malaysia will suffer a decline in its trade balance with the other eleven TPPA countries by nearly RM5 billion.

This finding provides another major reason why Malaysia should not join the TPPA. 

From arguments put forward by the Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI), Malaysia will gain from the TPPA by being able to sell more exports to the 11 other TPPA countries.

Even if this is true, analysts and critics including CAP have argued that it is dangerous to join the TPPA because of the economic and social harm to our country and our people caused by other aspects of the TPPA.

This includes the TPPA chapters on intellectual property, investment, government procurement, competition and state owned enterprises.

These chapters will result in Malaysia having to change many of our policies and laws, causing harm to the public interest including in areas of health, environment, distributional issues and political economy.

Even if the country enjoys a big gain in trade, it is not worthwhile sacrificing our loss of freedom and space to formulate our own policies, and not worthwhile to suffer so much damage to our economy and to our social fabric.

However, the new study shows that Malaysia will not even gain from trade if it signs the TPPA.    Instead, Malaysia will lose by at least RM4.77 billion in trade terms, as our imports will increase by more than our exports.

According to the paper, if  Malaysia joins the TPPA, its exports will increase to the other TPPA countries, but its imports from them will increase by even more, and thus the country will have a net loss in its trade balance.  The trade balance is the difference between the value of export and import of goods.

In 2013, Malaysia exported US$93.7 billion of goods to the other 11 TPPA countries, and imported US$73.9 billion of goods.  Malaysia thus enjoyed a surplus of US$19.8 billion in its trade balance with the 11 countries.

The new paper shows that after the TPPA is implemented, Malaysia’s exports to the 11 countries will increase by US$1.5 billion (from US$93.7 billion to US$95.2 billion).  But its imports will rise by more than that, i.e. by US$2.9 billion (from US$73.9 billion to US$76.8 billion).

Therefore the balance of trade for Malaysia with its 11 TPPA partner countries will worsen by US$1.465 billion (or RM4.79 billion).  Its trade surplus will fall from US$19.84 billion to US$18.37 billion.     

The meaning of this is that Malaysia will not gain in net terms from the increased trade as a result of the TPPA.   As imports will rise faster than exports, Malaysia will suffer a net loss in its trade balance.  The loss is significant, i.e. US$1.465 billion or RM4.79 billion (at the exchange rate at 17 October of US$1 = RM3.27).

This worsening of Malaysia’s balance of trade may even be more than the paper’s conclusion.  This is because the paper assumes that Malaysia will be able to export more textiles and clothing to the United States, at zero tariffs and without any other impediment.

In actual fact, the US is imposing a “yarn forward rule”, where TPPA countries like Malaysia can only use yarn from other TTPA countries when producing textiles and apparel items.  Thus the cost of production of some of Malaysia’s textiles and clothing will be more costly as it will not be able to use yarn from more and lower cost countries like China.

Thus the estimated increase in Malaysian exports of textiles and apparel items to the United States by about RM490 million (US$150 million) may exaggerate the gains for Malaysia.  If the increase of textiles exports is less than this RM490 million, then the loss in trade balance for Malaysia will be more than RM4.79 billion.  The loss could be more than RM5 billion. 

The new paper, “Trans Pacific partnership Agreement (TPPA): Implications for Malaysia’s Domestic Value Added Trade”, is written by Dr Rashmi Banga, a senior economist working in the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).    It is published by the Centre for WTO Studies as a Working Paper.

In estimating the effects of the TPPA on Malaysia’s trade in goods, the paper assumes that the TPPA results in zero import duties in the products of the 12 TPPA countries.  (This is a reasonable assumption as the aim of the TPPA countries is to eliminate tariffs on all or almost all products).

The paper can be downloaded from this website link:  http://wtocentre.iift.ac.in/workingpaper/TPP%20PAPER.pdf

SOME OTHER INTERESTING FINDINGS OF THE PAPER

The paper also has other interesting findings.  These findings, and some implications of these findings are as follows:

  • Due to the TPPA, many domestic companies and industries will face increased competition from imports.  There is thus a danger that the market share and sales of local companies and industries will decline, and that there will be a loss of jobs for Malaysian workers.  

The paper shows that imports will increase by more than US$100million (or RM327 million) a year in a number of  products  including  vehicles, iron and steel, plastics, boilers, rubber products, and tobacco.  For these products, 36%-85% of these imports will be new net imports, not just a change of the source of imports from non TPPA countries to TPPA countries. 

An example of the higher imports due to the TPPA is an increase in imports of cars and trucks from Japan by US$534 million (or RM 1.75 billion).   This may have an adverse effect on the sales of vehicles that are produced in Malaysia. 

  • A large part of the increase in Malaysian exports will be to Vietnam.  However, even if Malaysia does not join the TPPA, it would eventually enjoy this increase in exports to Vietnam when the full ASEAN free trade agreement is implemented.    According to the paper, 57% of Malaysia’s increased exports resulting from the TPPA are to Vietnam  (US$843 million out of a total US$1,486 million).   This suggests that most of the export increase would in any case take place even if Malaysia does not join the TPPA.  Thus Malaysia could enjoy the main gain that would have resulted from the TPPA without suffering the adverse effects of the TPPA, if it does not join the TPPA. 
  • Due to the TPPA, Malaysia’s trade balance with the US will probably decline by at least RM1 billion.  Malaysia’s exports to the USA will increase by only US$378 million but imports from the USA will rise by US$679 million.  Thus in terms of trade balance there will be a loss of US$301 million (RM984 million).  In fact the gain for exports for Malaysia will be less, because of the “yarn forward rule” which will reduce the increase in Malaysian textiles exports because that rule will increase the cost of production.  Thus the trade surplus that Malaysia enjoys with the USA may decline by more than RM1 billion due to the TPPA.  
  • Although Malaysia’s gross export earnings will rise by US$1.5 billion, in fact there will not be gains in net terms or value added terms.  This is because the TPPA will also increase the imports of components that are used as inputs into the exports, and these imports will displace some of the locally produced inputs.  In terms of “value added”  (what is produced and earned in Malaysia),  the TPPA will result in less value added of Malaysian export earnings.  The loss in value added of Malaysia’s exports to TPPA countries can be as much as US$17.6 billion, according to the paper.  Value added of exports is more important to the economy, as compared to gross exports, as it is a much better measure of the income (and also local employment) of the country.     

The new paper seems to contradict the results from an earlier study published by the Peterson Institute which had predicted that Malaysia would enjoy large gains by joining the TPPA. One reason for the different results from these two papers is that the Peterson Institute’s study was based on different assumptions.

The previous study was on estimates based on Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models.  The new paper by Dr Rashmi Banga gives a critique of the assumptions of these CGE models which overstate the gains because of unrealistic assumptions, including that there is full employment that is maintained (and  thus no effect  of the TPPA on employment) and that there would be a constant trade balance before and after the trade agreement.  The models are thus designed in a manner that the liberalisation resulting from the FTA will always lead to an overall gain. 

CONCLUSION

The new paper has several conclusions which are very significant.  One of these is that Malaysia will not enjoy net gains but will instead suffer net losses in trade in goods as a result of joining the TPPA.

This is a very disturbing result, with major implications.  

It is clear that Malaysia will suffer very significant losses in other areas of the TPPA, including intellectual property, investment, government procurement, state-owned enterprises and ban or restrictions on export taxes.

It is the assumption that all these losses and damage to the Malaysian economy and society and to our system of political economy may be worthwhile because of the assumed enormous benefits for Malaysia from expanded trade in goods.

However, if there is also a net loss to the country’s trade balance due to the TPPA, then there is really no rationale at all to want to join the TPPA.

Given the new information, CAP calls on the Government not to join the TPPA and instead to exit from the negotiations.  There is no reason to continue using the country’s scarce resources in taking part in negotiations that are expensive and that carries the high risk that the country will sign on to an agreement that is very damaging to the country’s interests. 

S.M. MOHAMED IDRIS

President

NOTE ON THE PAPER

The paper, “Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA):  Implications for Malaysia’s Domestic Value Added Trade”, is published by the Centre for WTO Studies as a Working Paper.  It can be downloaded from this internet web-page:

http://wtocentre.iift.ac.in/workingpaper/TPP%20PAPER.pdf

NOTE ON THE AUTHOR

Rashmi Banga is Senior Economist in UNCTAD (Unit of Economic Cooperation and Integration among Developing countries), Geneva. She is former Professor of Economics in School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University India, and has taught in University of Delhi for fifteen years. She was Senior Economist in DFID funded UNCTAD-India Project for assisting Ministry of Commerce & Industry of India in trade negotiations. She received her doctorate from Delhi School of Economics, specializing in development economics, international economics and econometrics.  She has published extensively in international journals on trade and FDI related issues and authored several books, including with, inter alia, Routledge and Oxford University Press. Her current area of research is global and regional value chains. She is the project coordinator and lead researcher in UNCTAD’s projects on regional value chains. She was awarded International Economic Development Research Award (IEDRA) of 2005 by EXIM Bank of India and has been a recipient of two Gold Medals for her research on globalization and development from Global Development Network (World Bank).

Latest

a landscape with hills and trees
Pollution & Extractives

Prohibit mining in environmentally sensitive areas

Sahabat Alam Malaysia (SAM) calls on the federal and state governments to prohibit mining including of rare earth elements (REE) in environmentally sensitive areas (ESAs)

Read More »
September 12, 2023
Climate Change

Need for cautious approach on alternative energy proposals in NETR

Sahabat Alam Malaysia (SAM) welcomes the launch by the Prime Minister of the National Energy Transition Roadmap (NETR) Phase 2 on 29 August 2023. We

Read More »
September 4, 2023
Development & Planning

Do not proceed with the Penang South Reclamation project!

The Consumers’ Association of Penang (CAP) and Sahabat Alam Malaysia (SAM) strongly appeal to both the Federal and State governments not to proceed with the Penang

Read More »
September 1, 2023
Agriculture

UPOV Convention is not suitable for Malaysia!

The International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) Convention denies farmers’ rights, encourages biopiracy and threatens agrobiodiversity. SAM fully supports the

Read More »
July 20, 2023
a landscape with hills and trees

Prohibit mining in environmentally sensitive areas

  • Publication Date | September 12, 2023
  • Document Type | Media Statement
  • Programmes | Pollution & Extractives
  • Issues | Biodiversity, Mining & Extractives, Pollution
Read more

Need for cautious approach on alternative energy proposals in NETR

  • Publication Date | September 4, 2023
  • Document Type | Letter to the Editor
  • Programmes | Climate Change
  • Issues | Energy, Mitigation
Read more

Do not proceed with the Penang South Reclamation project!

  • Publication Date | September 1, 2023
  • Document Type | Media Statement
  • Programmes | Development & Planning
  • Issues | Coastal Development, Coastal Ecosystem, Development, Fisheries, Food Sovereignty, Reclamation
Read more

UPOV Convention is not suitable for Malaysia!

  • Publication Date | July 20, 2023
  • Document Type | Media Statement
  • Programmes | Agriculture
  • Issues | Agriculture, Agroecology, Biodiversity, Food Sovereignty, Seeds, Trade & Investment
Read more
a landscape with hills and trees
Pollution & Extractives

Prohibit mining in environmentally sensitive areas

Read More »
September 12, 2023
Climate Change

Need for cautious approach on alternative energy proposals in NETR

Read More »
September 4, 2023
Development & Planning

Do not proceed with the Penang South Reclamation project!

Read More »
September 1, 2023
Agriculture

UPOV Convention is not suitable for Malaysia!

Read More »
July 20, 2023

Testimonials

Sahabat Alam Malaysia adalah satu badan bukan kerajaan (NGO) yang telah sekian lama berjuang mempertahan kelestarian alam. Ia juga mendidik masyarakat tentang pentingnya kebersamaan dalam pemikiran dan tindakan agar alam ini dapat kita wariskan kepada generasi hadapan dalam keadaan yang elok dan terpelihara. Dalam pada itu juga SAM giat membantu golongan nelayan pantai dalam memperjuangkan hak-hak mereka sehinggalah tertubuhnya Persatuan Pendidikan dan Kebajikan Nelayan Pantai Malaysia (JARING). Nelayan pantai sepenuh masa ini dididik oleh SAM sehingga mereka mampu memainkan peranan sebagai pemimpin nelayan yang meneruskan kesinambungan memperjuangkan hak-hak nelayan pantai lainnya. Sebagai contoh SAM telah berjaya menyedarkan masyarakat nelayan keperluan menjaga hutan paya bakau untuk kebaikan hasil tangkapan nelayan itu sendiri.
Jamaluddin Mohamad Bualik
Jamaluddin Mohamad BualikPersatuan Pendidikan dan Kebajikan Jaringan Nelayan Pantai Malaysia (JARING)
During the 1980s, I used to read about the Consumers’ Association of Penang (CAP) in the news. After retirement, some time in 2001, while lazing around, I read news about the construction of a carbon in leach plant using sodium cyanide to extract gold in Bukit Koman. My friends and I visited CAP and we were introduced to SAM and her legal team. We discussed the details of filing a case against the gold mining company and the department of environment with Ms Meenakshi Raman and her legal team. That was the beginning of a beautiful friendship between lawyers from SAM and many of us from Bukit Koman. We had many ups and downs in our struggle to shut down the gold mine that was causing a nuisance in our village. But, as a community we never gave up because SAM had our backs.
Hue Fui How
Hue Fui HowSecretary, Bukit Koman Ban Cyanide in Goldmining Action Committee (BCAC)
Sahabat Alam Malaysia adalah sebuah NGO yang memperjuangkan nasib masyarakat luar bandar khasnya. SAM menerima aduan-aduan masyarakat dan menyelesaikan masalah yang dihadapi. SAM telah mewujudkan ramai aktivis-aktivis sosial dan alam sekitar. Pada era 1980 dan 90an SAM sangat dihormati oleh masyarakat dan agensi kerajaan. Apabila media sosial menguasai maklumat maka SAM pun terkesan dan masalah masyarakat terus disalurkan dengan pelbagai cara. SAM perlu mewujudkan aktivis-aktivis pelapis yang muda untuk terus membantu masyarakat. SAM juga perlu membuat perubahan supaya banyak turun kelapangan dan jangan mengharapkan laporan media sahaja. Tingkatkan prestasi sebagaimana pada zaman kegemilangan SAM di era 80-90an.
Che Ani Mt Zain
Che Ani Mt Zain
SAM taught me the importance of social activism and the role it plays in upholding the rights of people and the protection of the environment. In my experience, SAM has never hesitated to speak up in defence of people and their environment, and has gone the extra mile to champion their rights, by helping communities take their battles to the higher ups and even to the courts.
Jessica Binwani
Jessica BinwaniPublic/Private Interest Lawyer
Semenjak kami kenal SAM, banyak pengalaman dan pengetahuan yg kami dapat. Kami telah belajar cara membuat baja asli daripada SAM. Semenjak itu, bermulalah minat kami dalam aktiviti pertanian. Dengan memperolehi kemahiran dalam membuat baja asli dan penanaman lestari, kami juga telah dapat menambahkan pendapatan sampingan kami. Ini lebih baik daripada tanah kami terbiar dan tidak diusahakan. Terima kasih SAM kerana sudi memberi bantuan dan tunjuk ajar kepada Persatuan kami.
Chedo Anak Nyuwen
Chedo Anak NyuwenPersatuan Penduduk Sg Buri, Bakong, Marudi
My journey with SAM started when her community organisers took me to the meet the paddy farmers of Kedah, connecting my growing interest in environmental law with our people who struggle to work the land in the face of pollution, replacement of traditional seeds with commercial hybrids and their accompanying chemical package of fertilisers and weedicides. I then had the honour to work with SAM in the struggle for the rights of the native communities of Sarawak, in defence of their forests from massive logging and destructive mega-projects. In every issue that SAM takes up, she combines rigorous research with the realities and voices of the communities to advocate for policies and laws that care for people and nature. From the courts to the elected legislators to policy makers and implementers and to the United Nations, SAM walks side by side with the communities in Malaysia. How can I not be inspired by the vision and passion of the generations of women and men who coalesce to form SAM?
Chee Yoke Ling
Chee Yoke Lingstudent of SAM, Executive Director of Third World Network, SAM’s sister organisation

Support our mission

Do your part for the environment with your donations. Each contribution enables our organisation to create more impact towards environmental justice.

Donate here
Sahabat Alam Malaysia
Sahabat Alam Malaysia - Member of Friends of the Earth International
Sahabat Alam Malaysia
Sahabat Alam Malaysia - Member of Friends of the Earth International

Sahabat Alam Malaysia (Headquarters)
No. 1, Jalan Joki,
11400 Penang,
Malaysia
Tel: +604 827 6930
Fax: +604 827 6932

Sahabat Alam Malaysia (Marudi Office)
129A, First Floor,
Jalan Tuanku Taha,
P.O.Box 216,
98058 Marudi,
Baram, Sarawak,
Malaysia
Tel & Fax: +6085 756 973

Sitemap

  • Home
  • About
  • Programmes
  • Resources
  • Archive
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Usage of the Website Content

Get the latest news

Facebook Twitter Youtube Instagram
Sahabat Alam Malaysia
Sahabat Alam Malaysia - Member of Friends of the Earth International

Sahabat Alam Malaysia (Headquarters)
No. 1, Jalan Joki, 11400 Penang,
Malaysia
Tel: +604 827 6930
Fax: +604 827 6932

Sahabat Alam Malaysia (Marudi Office)
129A, First Floor,
Jalan Tuanku Taha,
P.O.Box 216,
98058 Marudi, Baram, Sarawak,
Malaysia
Tel & Fax: +6085 758 973

Sitemap

  • Home
  • About
  • Programmes
  • Resources
  • Archive
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Usage of the Website Content

Get the latest news

Follow us here

Facebook Twitter Youtube Instagram
Copyright © 2023 Sahabat Alam Malaysia