Skip to content
Sahabat Alam Malaysia
  • Home
  • About
  • Programmes
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Shop
  • BMBM
  • Donate
  • Archive

Proposed TBT Annex in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

  • Publication Date | May 21, 2013
  • Document Type | Media Statement
  • Programmes | Development & Planning
  • Issues | Trade & Investment
  • Tags | GMO, QUID, TBT Annex, TPP, Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
Share on email
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
PDF

SAM supports the call by the Consumers’ Association of Penang to the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) to immediately withdraw the Malaysian proposal tabled at the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA).

The Consumers Association of Penang (CAP) calls on the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) and the Department of Standards (Standards Malaysia) to immediately withdraw a Malaysian proposal that it has tabled at the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) negotiations. We believe that this proposal will have potentially dangerous impacts on public health, food safety and consumer choice.

The proposal by the Government of Malaysia was tabled as an annex to the chapter on technical barriers to trade (TBT) at the 15th TPPA negotiations in Auckland, New Zealand, last December, and is currently being negotiated at the 17th round of the TPPA negotiations currently taking place in Lima, Peru.

According to an Inside US Trade report dated 9 January, 2013, Malaysia tabled the proposal which, if accepted by the other 11 countries participating in the talks, would prevent TPPA governments from requiring companies to disclose their proprietary formulas for their products. According to the report, the proposed annex states that ‘governments should not require the disclosure of proprietary formulas unless there is a legitimate need to do so.’ The proposal also requires that in the event that there is a legitimate need for such disclosure, the government requiring the disclosure is to ‘provide protection for the disclosed information’.
We have not been able to fully analyze the proposal as the secrecy of the TPPA negotiations have kept the actual text from public view. However, based on our preliminary analysis of the proposal as reported, there are a number of worrisome implications of the TBT Annex as proposed.

Firstly, the proposed annex raises concerns in relation to the concept and institution of halal consumer products for Malaysia’s Muslim populace. The authorities have yet to explain whether, and how, its proposal to prevent TPPA governments from requiring companies to hand over proprietary formulas for their products will affect the integrity of halal labelling on packaged food products. This is a critical issue for Muslim Malaysian consumers and must be handled with their needs and religious requirements in mind. 

Secondly, quantitative ingredient declaration (QUID) on food labelling has become increasingly important as consumers world-wide seek to know the composition of the processed, pre-packaged foods they are purchasing on an increasing basis.[i] The significance of QUID labelling can be seen from the different effects that varying QUID labelling requirements can have in different countries.

– While Thailand’s QUID labelling requirements warn consumers that 39% of a particular cereal product is composed of added sugar, consumers in the US – whose QUID labelling regime does not require this – are not given this information;

– While Thai QUID labelling informs consumers in that country that a certain tinned blueberry product is composed of 49% water, consumers purchasing the same tin of blueberries in the US are not so informed.[ii]

Without the disclosure of such information, consumers would not be able to identify foods that contain the highest amounts of the healthy ingredients and the lowest amount of unhealthy ones. The proposed Annex, in allowing companies to keep their proprietary formulas secret, would likely negate QUID labelling efforts that are attempting to address this issue.

Thirdly, even in countries where full nutrition labelling is required, QUID is important because the amount of healthy ingredients cannot be determined by reading the nutrition information panel alone.[iii] The need for health-related ingredient information on food labels cannot be adequately satisfied by, as is the current practice in the US and many other places, merely disclosing quantitative nutrient information or the names of ingredients in decreasing order by weight, as in Malaysia. The World Health Organization (WHO) asserts that QUID for these ingredients in processed foods is necessary because ‘it is the foods themselves, not the presence of specific nutrients in the foods, which may create the beneficial or detrimental effect on health.’[iv]
Finally, the negotiations at the World Trade Organization have shown that it is immensely difficult for WTO member governments to prove the legitimacy of their actions affecting trade due to the stringent necessity tests imposed by WTO jurisprudence. There would be an onerous burden on governments to prove the ‘legitimacy’ of a directive to a company to disclose the proprietary formula of its food product(s). 

Conclusion

Malaysian consumer and other public health interested groups such as CAP had supported the Malaysian government in having mandatory labeling provisions for genetically modified (GM) foods, for example, in the interest of consumer welfare and public health.

It is therefore ironic that the agribusiness industry and lobbies such the Grocery Manufacturers of America (GMA) have succeeded in convincing quarters within our very government that product formulas are their intellectual property and that manufacturers should thus not be required to disclose the precise weight or percentage of each ingredient since these are ‘trade secrets’. 

Such an action as this proposal indicates that it – along with the whole range of positions Malaysia has apparently taken in the TPPA – was done without meaningfully consulting health, food safety, consumer and other civil society groups and without a proper study of its impacts.

It provides yet another example, among many that need not be cited here, that Malaysia should withdraw from the TPPA. The government has so far not been able to prove to its people – particularly by showing us the texts that will bind us legally and internationally to the TPPA – that the benefits outweigh the costs.

CAP believes the proposed annex to the TBT chapter of the TPPA should never have been tabled, and calls on government to immediately withdraw this proposal from the discussions at the current round in Peru.

S.M. Mohamed Idris

President

Endnotes

[i] http://cspinet.org/reports/codex/quidonlabelling.pdf

[ii]International Association Of Consumer Food Organizations, http://cspinet.org/reports/codex/quidonlabelling.pdf

[iii] See Codex General Standard For The Labelling Of Prepackaged Foods, Codex STAN 1-1985 (Rev. 1-1991): ‘5.1 QUANTITATIVE LABELLING OF INGREDIENTS; 5.1.1 Where the labelling of a food places special emphasis on the presence of one or more valuable and/or characterizing ingredients, or where the description of the food has the same effect, the ingoing percentage of the ingredient (m/m) at the time of manufacture shall be declared; 5.1.2 Similarly, where the labelling of a food places special emphasis on the low content of one or more ingredients, the percentage of the ingredient (m/m) in the final product shall be declared.’ http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/Y2770E/y2770e02.htm

[ii] ‘Most packaged foods have to carry labels which show the percentage of the key or characterising ingredients or components in the food. This allows you to compare similar products.
The characterising ingredient for strawberry yoghurt would be strawberries and the label would say, for example, 9% strawberries. An example of a characterising component could be the cocoa solids in chocolate. Some foods, such as white bread or cheese, may have no characterising ingredients or characterising components.’ http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/…/ingredientlistsandpe5592.…

[iii] For example, nutrition labelling does not permit consumers to compare the whole grain content of various breads or crackers, the amount of vegetables in two different brands of vegetarian lasagna, the amount of dried fruit in so-called “fruit bars,” or the amount of added sugars in apple sauce. This limitation of nutrition labelling is obvious in light of the WHO/FAO Action Plan which recommends QUID in addition to mandatory nutrition labelling of foods.’ See IACFO, http://cspinet.org/reports/codex/QUIDComment_oct2006.pdf.

[iv] IACFO, http://cspinet.org/reports/codex/quidonlabelling.pdf

Latest

Development & Planning

In Memoriam – Trade Unionist Balakrishnan Nadeson

On 11.01.2023, we lost one of our very own former staff, Balakrishnan Nadeson, who succumbed to his illness. Balakrishnan, or rather Union Bala as we

Read More »
January 18, 2023
Development & Planning

Set up Commission of Inquiry for the landslide tragedy in Batang Kali

SAM is shocked to learn about the horrific landslide tragedy in Batang Kali which has claimed several lives including children. Time and again we have

Read More »
December 16, 2022
cable car, isolated, winter-3989542.jpg
Forests & Biodiversity

Be transparent on cable car project

Sahabat Alam Malaysia (SAM) is very alarmed to learn about the announcement by the Chief Minister of Penang that the cable car project to Penang

Read More »
December 14, 2022
Forests & Biodiversity

CBD COP15 – How it has fared so far

Week one (03 – 10 December 2022) of the 15th session of the Conference of Parties (COP 15) to the Convention onBiological Diversity (CBD) taking place

Read More »
December 14, 2022

In Memoriam – Trade Unionist Balakrishnan Nadeson

  • Publication Date | January 18, 2023
  • Document Type | Articles & Stories
  • Programmes | Development & Planning
  • Issues | Development, General, Pollution, Toxics
Read more

Set up Commission of Inquiry for the landslide tragedy in Batang Kali

  • Publication Date | December 16, 2022
  • Document Type | Media Statement
  • Programmes | Development & Planning
  • Issues | Adaptation, Development
Read more
cable car, isolated, winter-3989542.jpg

Be transparent on cable car project

  • Publication Date | December 14, 2022
  • Document Type | Media Statement
  • Programmes | Forests & Biodiversity
  • Issues | Conservation, Development, Urban Development
Read more

CBD COP15 – How it has fared so far

  • Publication Date | December 14, 2022
  • Document Type | Articles & Stories
  • Programmes | Forests & Biodiversity
  • Issues | Biodiversity, Conservation, Deforestation, Genetic Engineering, Indigenous Peoples, International Treaties, Land Rights, Mitigation, Wildlife
Read more
Development & Planning

In Memoriam – Trade Unionist Balakrishnan Nadeson

Read More »
January 18, 2023
Development & Planning

Set up Commission of Inquiry for the landslide tragedy in Batang Kali

Read More »
December 16, 2022
cable car, isolated, winter-3989542.jpg
Forests & Biodiversity

Be transparent on cable car project

Read More »
December 14, 2022
Forests & Biodiversity

CBD COP15 – How it has fared so far

Read More »
December 14, 2022

Testimonials

Sahabat Alam Malaysia adalah satu badan bukan kerajaan (NGO) yang telah sekian lama berjuang mempertahan kelestarian alam. Ia juga mendidik masyarakat tentang pentingnya kebersamaan dalam pemikiran dan tindakan agar alam ini dapat kita wariskan kepada generasi hadapan dalam keadaan yang elok dan terpelihara. Dalam pada itu juga SAM giat membantu golongan nelayan pantai dalam memperjuangkan hak-hak mereka sehinggalah tertubuhnya Persatuan Pendidikan dan Kebajikan Nelayan Pantai Malaysia (JARING). Nelayan pantai sepenuh masa ini dididik oleh SAM sehingga mereka mampu memainkan peranan sebagai pemimpin nelayan yang meneruskan kesinambungan memperjuangkan hak-hak nelayan pantai lainnya. Sebagai contoh SAM telah berjaya menyedarkan masyarakat nelayan keperluan menjaga hutan paya bakau untuk kebaikan hasil tangkapan nelayan itu sendiri.
Jamaluddin Mohamad Bualik
Jamaluddin Mohamad BualikPersatuan Pendidikan dan Kebajikan Jaringan Nelayan Pantai Malaysia (JARING)
During the 1980s, I used to read about the Consumers’ Association of Penang (CAP) in the news. After retirement, some time in 2001, while lazing around, I read news about the construction of a carbon in leach plant using sodium cyanide to extract gold in Bukit Koman. My friends and I visited CAP and we were introduced to SAM and her legal team. We discussed the details of filing a case against the gold mining company and the department of environment with Ms Meenakshi Raman and her legal team. That was the beginning of a beautiful friendship between lawyers from SAM and many of us from Bukit Koman. We had many ups and downs in our struggle to shut down the gold mine that was causing a nuisance in our village. But, as a community we never gave up because SAM had our backs.
Hue Fui How
Hue Fui HowSecretary, Bukit Koman Ban Cyanide in Goldmining Action Committee (BCAC)
Sahabat Alam Malaysia adalah sebuah NGO yang memperjuangkan nasib masyarakat luar bandar khasnya. SAM menerima aduan-aduan masyarakat dan menyelesaikan masalah yang dihadapi. SAM telah mewujudkan ramai aktivis-aktivis sosial dan alam sekitar. Pada era 1980 dan 90an SAM sangat dihormati oleh masyarakat dan agensi kerajaan. Apabila media sosial menguasai maklumat maka SAM pun terkesan dan masalah masyarakat terus disalurkan dengan pelbagai cara. SAM perlu mewujudkan aktivis-aktivis pelapis yang muda untuk terus membantu masyarakat. SAM juga perlu membuat perubahan supaya banyak turun kelapangan dan jangan mengharapkan laporan media sahaja. Tingkatkan prestasi sebagaimana pada zaman kegemilangan SAM di era 80-90an.
Che Ani Mt Zain
Che Ani Mt Zain
SAM taught me the importance of social activism and the role it plays in upholding the rights of people and the protection of the environment. In my experience, SAM has never hesitated to speak up in defence of people and their environment, and has gone the extra mile to champion their rights, by helping communities take their battles to the higher ups and even to the courts.
Jessica Binwani
Jessica BinwaniPublic/Private Interest Lawyer
Semenjak kami kenal SAM, banyak pengalaman dan pengetahuan yg kami dapat. Kami telah belajar cara membuat baja asli daripada SAM. Semenjak itu, bermulalah minat kami dalam aktiviti pertanian. Dengan memperolehi kemahiran dalam membuat baja asli dan penanaman lestari, kami juga telah dapat menambahkan pendapatan sampingan kami. Ini lebih baik daripada tanah kami terbiar dan tidak diusahakan. Terima kasih SAM kerana sudi memberi bantuan dan tunjuk ajar kepada Persatuan kami.
Chedo Anak Nyuwen
Chedo Anak NyuwenPersatuan Penduduk Sg Buri, Bakong, Marudi
My journey with SAM started when her community organisers took me to the meet the paddy farmers of Kedah, connecting my growing interest in environmental law with our people who struggle to work the land in the face of pollution, replacement of traditional seeds with commercial hybrids and their accompanying chemical package of fertilisers and weedicides. I then had the honour to work with SAM in the struggle for the rights of the native communities of Sarawak, in defence of their forests from massive logging and destructive mega-projects. In every issue that SAM takes up, she combines rigorous research with the realities and voices of the communities to advocate for policies and laws that care for people and nature. From the courts to the elected legislators to policy makers and implementers and to the United Nations, SAM walks side by side with the communities in Malaysia. How can I not be inspired by the vision and passion of the generations of women and men who coalesce to form SAM?
Chee Yoke Ling
Chee Yoke Lingstudent of SAM, Executive Director of Third World Network, SAM’s sister organisation

Support our mission

Do your part for the environment with your donations. Each contribution enables our organisation to create more impact towards environmental justice.

Donate here

Sahabat Alam Malaysia (Headquarters)
No. 1, Jalan Joki,
11400 Penang,
Malaysia
Tel: +604 827 6930
Fax: +604 827 6932

Sahabat Alam Malaysia (Marudi Office)
129A, First Floor,
Jalan Tuanku Taha,
P.O.Box 216,
98058 Marudi,
Baram, Sarawak,
Malaysia
Tel & Fax: +6085 758 973

Sitemap

  • Home
  • About
  • Programmes
  • Resources
  • Archive
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Usage of the Website Content

Get the latest news

Facebook Twitter Youtube Instagram

Sahabat Alam Malaysia (Headquarters)
No. 1, Jalan Joki, 11400 Penang,
Malaysia
Tel: +604 827 6930
Fax: +604 827 6932

Sahabat Alam Malaysia (Marudi Office)
129A, First Floor,
Jalan Tuanku Taha,
P.O.Box 216,
98058 Marudi, Baram, Sarawak,
Malaysia
Tel & Fax: +6085 758 973

Sitemap

  • Home
  • About
  • Programmes
  • Resources
  • Archive
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Usage of the Website Content

Get the latest news

Follow us here

Facebook Twitter Youtube Instagram
Copyright © 2023 Sahabat Alam Malaysia